Apple iPod Nano 6G Review

£130Sep 2010

Price comparison powered by Reevoo

£99
£99
£102
£104
£108
£108
£108
£112
£115
£115
£115
£117

Stuff says 3

Too feature-light to be a must-have, too expensive to be an impulse purchase

Images

Video review

Stuff magazine Wed, Sep 8 2010, 5:00AM

The iPod Nano has undergone a radical transformation for its sixth generation. Everything has changed: the Nano has lost its scrollwheel, camera and video playback – and become a touchscreen iPod Shuffle, right down to the alluring range of colours and built-in clip.

But there’s a problem: while the iPod Shuffle is cheap and simple, the new Nano is almost as pricey as an iPod Touch.

How small is too small?
The new Nano is a postage stamp-sized screen and little else, which means holding and poking it makes you feel like a sausage-fingered giant. The Multi-Touch interface is slick and responsive, but the lack of space makes gestures uncomfortable. So it’s probably a blessing that the Nano isn’t a fully fledged iOS device, and won’t run third party apps.

Given the extent of its miniaturisation, it’s hardly surprising that the new Nano has lost the camera that Apple introduced in the last generation – but the lack of video playback seems bizarre. Yes, the 1.5in screen is small, but no smaller than the original Nano – and its 240x240-pixel resolution makes album artwork looks lovely. We think music videos would look good too.

Big Brother is watching
Despite its slight frame, Apple has given the Nano has some nice features. Top of the list is VoiceOver – which, at the press of a button, speaks the name of the song and artist currently playing. But as VoiceOver is built into the £40 iPod Shuffle, it’s hardly a USP for the Nano. There’s also an FM radio, auto-generated Genius playlists and an accelerometer that allows you to shake the Nano to play a random song.

Review continues after the break...

With a built-in pedometer and Nike+ compatibility, the Nano can stake a claim to be a proper training partner. And its sturdy clip with hold it firmly in place no matter how hard your work out. But you’ll need to plug a receiver into the Nano to use Nike+, which will almost double its size. The iPod Touch, on the other hand, has a Nike+ receiver built in.

And it’s the strength of the iPod’s big brother that really shows up the Nano’s limitations. An app-fuelled iPod Touch – with hi-res display and HD video recording – is available for just £60 more.

Which is why we think you'd be better advised to save your pennies.

Comments

  1. lukestuffmag123

    14 weeks ago

    I have got the Ipod nano 6g and I love it. Unlike the other nano's it is touch screen and also it is big enough for you not to make a mistake touching the apps. It is great!

  2. ashley_gem18

    17 weeks ago

    I love apple products but not so affordable though'

  3. adelino

    26 weeks ago

    Surely with this website it will be easier for us to send the request to the things that exist on this website. Thank you. safety signs

  4. berlymegan

    27 weeks ago

    As far as I Tibet is a very beautiful place and loaded with religious norms. Probably tends to be a good place for a spiritual tour. memory foam mattresses

  5. Susancai114

    28 weeks ago

    This review to Apple iPod Nano 6G is good for reading. I like what you say. hearing aid manufacturers

  6. kye_norman

    43 weeks ago

    Had it, sold it, went back to my previous nano! hated the bloody thing!

  7. Flyindance

    1 year ago

    I just bought a MP4 player from http://www.tinydeal.com/index.php?main_page=ws_search_result&inc_subcat=1&search_in_description=1&keyword=2GB+1.65%22+Touch+Clip+MP4+Player&px=8rop

    It is a copy of blue iPod Nano 6 in terms of outlook. Made from aluminum alloy, the shell is luminous in a lovely way, though not as elegant as a real Nano 6’s. Touch screen is sensitive enough, but 1.65 inch is too small a size for me who’s a man with thick fingers. And the small screen makes visual applications like e-book, image, and video not too enjoyable from my point of view. If your eyes are suited to the size, these functions are OK since the resolution ratio of the display is relatively high. In a word, this MP4 player is for showing more than using, girls more than boys -- again, from my point of view.

    It is compatible with the audio formats of MP3 and WMA as said in the instructions, while the tune color is not excellent, not bad. AMV is a high-definition video format, so the files are often very large due to high bit rates -- maybe not too large in comparison with the 8Gb memory. Besides, compatible with TXT is a feature of convenience; FM radio signal reception is excellent; and recorded voice is clear in general as the microphone reject noise efficiently. In the end, I like its shape more than any feature else.

  8. davidpalmer12345

    1 year ago

    you can get a 16gb ipod nano by going to http://apple.freebiejeebies.co.uk/405308 and completing one of the offers there (many will set you back only £5) and getting 8 friends to do the same. Even if you paid each of those friends the £5 yourself, you'd get the ipod for £45...not bad considering it would cost £159 to buy one outright!

Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment

Buzz-o-meter

Buzz-o-meter: apple ipod nano

  1. Click to see all coverage from Dec 27, 2011
    10
    December 27, 2011
  2. Click to see all coverage from Dec 28, 2011
    3
    December 28, 2011
  3. Click to see all coverage from Dec 29, 2011
    3
    December 29, 2011
  4. Click to see all coverage from Dec 30, 2011
    12
    December 30, 2011
  5. Click to see all coverage from Dec 31, 2011
    2
    December 31, 2011
  6. Click to see all coverage from Jan 01, 2012
    2
    January 01, 2012
  7. Click to see all coverage from Jan 02, 2012
    0
    January 02, 2012
  8. Click to see all coverage from Jan 03, 2012
    3
    January 03, 2012
  9. Click to see all coverage from Jan 04, 2012
    1
    January 04, 2012
  10. Click to see all coverage from Jan 05, 2012
    3
    January 05, 2012
  11. Click to see all coverage from Jan 06, 2012
    0
    January 06, 2012
  12. Click to see all coverage from Jan 07, 2012
    1
    January 07, 2012
  13. Click to see all coverage from Jan 08, 2012
    1
    January 08, 2012
  14. Click to see all coverage from Jan 09, 2012
    2
    January 09, 2012
  15. Click to see all coverage from Jan 10, 2012
    5
    January 10, 2012
  16. Click to see all coverage from Jan 11, 2012
    7
    January 11, 2012
  17. Click to see all coverage from Jan 12, 2012
    3
    January 12, 2012
  18. Click to see all coverage from Jan 13, 2012
    3
    January 13, 2012
  19. Click to see all coverage from Jan 14, 2012
    0
    January 14, 2012
  20. Click to see all coverage from Jan 15, 2012
    0
    January 15, 2012
  21. Click to see all coverage from Jan 16, 2012
    2
    January 16, 2012
  22. Click to see all coverage from Jan 17, 2012
    2
    January 17, 2012
  23. Click to see all coverage from Jan 18, 2012
    0
    January 18, 2012
  24. Click to see all coverage from Jan 19, 2012
    0
    January 19, 2012
  25. Click to see all coverage from Jan 20, 2012
    4
    January 20, 2012
  26. Click to see all coverage from Jan 21, 2012
    1
    January 21, 2012
  27. Click to see all coverage from Jan 22, 2012
    0
    January 22, 2012
  28. Click to see all coverage from Jan 23, 2012
    3
    January 23, 2012
  29. Click to see all coverage from Jan 24, 2012
    2
    January 24, 2012
  30. Click to see all coverage from Jan 25, 2012
    4
    January 25, 2012
  31. Click to see all coverage from Jan 26, 2012
    5
    January 26, 2012
  32. Click to see all coverage from Jan 27, 2012
    1
    January 27, 2012
  33. Click to see all coverage from Jan 28, 2012
    1
    January 28, 2012
  34. Click to see all coverage from Jan 29, 2012
    1
    January 29, 2012
  35. Click to see all coverage from Jan 30, 2012
    3
    January 30, 2012
  36. Click to see all coverage from Jan 31, 2012
    2
    January 31, 2012
  37. Click to see all coverage from Feb 01, 2012
    26
    February 01, 2012
  38. Click to see all coverage from Feb 02, 2012
    11
    February 02, 2012
  39. Click to see all coverage from Feb 03, 2012
    5
    February 03, 2012
  40. Click to see all coverage from Feb 04, 2012
    1
    February 04, 2012
  41. Click to see all coverage from Feb 05, 2012
    0
    February 05, 2012
  42. Click to see all coverage from Feb 06, 2012
    3
    February 06, 2012
  43. Click to see all coverage from Feb 07, 2012
    5
    February 07, 2012
  44. Click to see all coverage from Feb 08, 2012
    6
    February 08, 2012
  45. Click to see all coverage from Feb 09, 2012
    2
    February 09, 2012
  46. Click to see all coverage from Feb 10, 2012
    4
    February 10, 2012
  47. Click to see all coverage from Feb 11, 2012
    1
    February 11, 2012
  48. Click to see all coverage from Feb 12, 2012
    0
    February 12, 2012