Apple iMac 2012 hands-on review

Apple iMac hands-on review – design
The most arresting thing about the new 21.5in and 27in iMacs is just how skinny they are. The screen tapers to 5mm – that’s thinner than an iPhone – and elegantly rounds out to a bulge in the back that connects the stand and contains the computing goodies. Even so, it’s amazing that so much computer is crammed into such a small space.
The aluminium cases are also completely seamless, except for a small service panel at the back, and with all of the ports stored in a neat row. This isn’t necessarily the most practical arrangement, and many PCs offer more than the four USB 3.0 ports found here, but the line-up certainly looks pretty. Tweakers beware – there’s no user access to the innards of the 21.5-incher, so future upgrades will be nigh on impossible.
Let’s not forget that the sleek look also means you lose the optical drive. Anyone who wants to rip CDs or DVDs will have to disrupt the sanctity of the design with an unsightly SuperDrive tethered to the back of the machine.

Apple iMac hands-on review – screen
The iMacs’ new fully laminated IPS panels look fantastic – bright, colourful and crisp from normal usage distance, with the appearance of almost floating on the surface of the glass. Apple says a new coating eliminates 75 per cent of the reflections that plagued previous iMacs, and we were struck by the lack of glare in the bright demo room.
Next to the Retina Displays of other Apple kit, the resolution won’t astound, but the cost of a 20in-plus Retina Display would likely be prohibitive. And if you're looking for the multitouch screens of competitor Windows 8 all-in-ones such as Lenovo’s A720 you'll be disappointed – Apple’s still not convinced about touch on desktops.
Apple iMac hands-on review – performance
It’s hard to judge just how quick the Apple iMac 2012 edition is without a benchmark for comparison, but the amped-up, 21.5in, 3.1GHz i7 model we looked at positively flew. iTunes and Safari loaded in a split second, possibly owing to the new optional ‘Fusion Drive’ which combines 128GB SSD storage with either 1TB or 3TB of hard disk space. Apple is at pains to point out that this is no ordinary hybrid drive; rather, the system automagically keeps regularly accessed items in the SSD portion to ensure they’re always on tap. Very clever.
Again, we had no time to put the graphics through their paces with a demanding game, but on paper the 21.5 iMac’s GT 640M and 650M options are fairly rudimentary; the 660M and 675M of the 27-inch will be much more capable for gaming.
Apple iMac hands-on review – verdict
There are a few things to consider before dropping £1100 on a 21.5in iMac or £1500 on a 27-incher. First is that, unlike many PCs, upgrade possibilities are incredibly limited. It’ll be worth investing in the most powerful machine that you can, or risk future disappointment.
Second, the 21.5in design has no option for powerful graphics, so if you want to game, you’d be much better off with the bigger, pricier 27-incher.
Third, there’s little doubt you can buy better-specced PCs for less money. But this point is somewhat moot, as those PCs won’t run the slick, hardware-optimised Mac OS X, nor will they look as great as an iMac does.
In sum, these are far and away the most desirable all-in-one PCs we’ve seen. You’ll just have to pay more for the privilege of owning one.
You might also like
Motorola HC1 is Project Glass in disguise
Buy an iPad 3 with Retina Display for less than an iPad 2
iPad Mini brings Thumb Rejection tech to Apple’s tablets




Comments
MichaelPrice
30 weeks ago
Lose the optical drive? You're kidding, aren't you? I have a USB 3 external hdd connected full time acting as my Time Machine, now I would have to also add a freestanding SuperDrive? What on earth is the point of making this thinner (I haven't moved my iMac since the day I bought it) if it means you have to start cluttering up the damn desktop with 'bits' added on. Even the iMac Mini has an optical drive! Step backwards, in my opinion. So 'thanks but no thanks'. Stick with my very capable iMac, 16GB 3.3GHz plus optical SuperDrive...
JGowan
30 weeks ago
I guess the point is remove a drive that typically is not used very often for the average user, JUST like they've recently done to the Macbook Pro line. Customers have the option of wirelessly borrowing another PCs drive on the same network or to buy a very reasonably priced SuperDrive ($79) that they can pull out of a drawer when they need it. Most will collect dust. They are quite attractive and about as big as the new-ish standalone track pad.
About the iMac mini (sic), (you mean the Mac mini) -- the last two Mini's have had the drives REMOVED so I'm not sure what you're talking about.
I think you are making a huge deal for no reason. Of course, you probably bitched when Apple dropped the floppy.
m1kes
29 weeks ago
it certainly looks amazing, if you can afford the price tag.
I wouldnt mind losing the optical drive, i cant really remember last time i used one ,compared to using a USB stick, SD card, or otherwise just downloading from the net/wifi.
also I think 3 USBs is probably enough for most people.
However siting the SD card slot on the rear of the screen (right next to the USB's), along with the headphone socket is rather impractical.
Each time you insert a fiddly SD card you'll have to turn the screen over or around to see it and risk pulling out any USB connections?
Apple's design is form over function. ie they dont want to 'mess' up the looks front or sides with something readily accessible.
AndiiRoo
29 weeks ago
No Touchscreen, crazy crazy at this stage of the game with everything else Touchscreen
An initial 'play' with a Windows 8 Touchscreen all-in-one at PC World tells me this is the way to go no matter how much I would like a new iMac
Music software is just one area where touch for creating, mixing, page turning etc etc makes it all so much easier and nicer
Pity. I have been holding off upgrading in the hope that Apple would sort it out before Windows 8 got to market. They're missing the boat
– [Apple’s still not convinced about touch on desktops]
zerodeluxe
24 weeks ago
Won't having a touch screen open you up to constant greasy fingermarks and dirt over the screen? Think they're probably right not to head that way.
Other than educational uses for small children or those with special needs, I don't see any benefit in touch screen whatsoever. My screen is usually out or arms reach anyway, so it would be more effort than using the mouse!
Losing the optical drive is a bigger blow for me as I rip a lot of CDs to my iPod.
Mind you, it's all academic as I can't afford one yet anyhoo.