If 3D takes your fancy, chances are you’ve already been reading about Samsung’s UE40C7000 TV. But if you want to start watching 3D movies, you’re also going to need a 3D source. Fear not: Samsung makes one of those as well – the BD-C6900.
It costs a fairly modest £349 and looks good, too, with a glossy, button-free chassis. True, it doesn’t feel particularly high-end, and it attracts smudgy fingerprints, but the C6900 is stylish at the price.
Great with 2D too
There are no 3D Blu-ray discs on the market yet, so you’ll be watching a lot of 2D content in the early days.
And it’s more than fine in this regard, offering up perfectly judged colours, plenty of detail and impressive punch. It’s not quite perfect, though: there’s a smidge of judder and smear to slow pans, and, for outright insight, Panasonic’s £200 DMP-BD65 just pips it.
If you’re slumming it with DVD, the BD-C6900 proves a very capable upscaler. Its overall sharpness, detail and vibrancy are among the best at this price.
Sound, compared with our favourite budget players, lacks a little weight and dynamic punch. Detail’s decent, and there’s never a hint of brightness, but it doesn’t quite have the guts to make the most of an action soundtrack.
Review continues after the break…
Audio issues
An extra warning on sound: current receivers will not be able to pass through the BD-C6900’s 3D signal. This means you’ll have to either buy a 3D-enabled receiver when they hit the market, or use the 7.1 analogue multi-channel output.
It’s a shame that two HDMI outputs – one for picture and one for sound – aren’t included. As is the fact that you can’t trim the speaker levels and distances for the 7.1 output.
Mixed 3D performance
So what’s the BD-C6900 like with 3D Blu-ray? Well, we have a couple of reservations, particularly with some occasional double-imaging, but there’s no denying the thrill of seeing effects pop from the screen, or the overall immersion offered by scenery with tangible depth.
As more 3D players arrive we’ll get a better idea of the Samsung’s ability, but for now we’re impressed, even with those niggles.
The fact remains, though, that you can buy ‘normal’ players that offer slightly better pictures and better sound for less money – and, while there’s so little 3D content around, those are our priorities.











Comments
gaslinigianni
1 year ago
It’s a shame that two HDMI outputs – one for picture and one for sound – aren’t included. Otherwise it could have been the best DVD player and Blu-Ray player on the market. Currently I'm converting all my old VHS to DVD through a vhs to dvd converter; soon I'll buy one of this in order to play all my brand new DVDs.
name necklace
1 year ago
Great blog and very good written also.it helps clear up some questions I had. thank you. success.
name necklace
anirudhsingh
1 year ago
awesome peice of tech....:)
troutfisher
2 years ago
Good review though I can't see much point in splashing out for a Blu-ray player just yet... way too early. Incidentally it's worth pointing out that 3D-capable AV receivers are already available - the Onkyo TX-SR308, TX-SR508, TX-SR578 and TX-SR608 are all 3D-capable and are available now (I know this because I'm looking at a TX-SR608 - which is fantastic - in my living room right now!).