Apple iMac 27in 2010 Review

£1400Sep 2010

Stuff says 5 Hot Buy

A beautiful body and a stunning screen, the 27in iMac remains the best all-in-one around

Images

Stuff magazine Fri, Sep 10 2010, 6:00AM

No one wants to design desktop towers any more, but they've still failed to match Apple's aesthetic for all-in-ones. Rivals like the EeeTouch, Acer Aspire Z5610, Sony Vaio L or Lenovo's IdeaCentre are technically worthy, but design-wise they just don't compare.

The iMac is an astoundingly beautiful computer, all shiny unibody aluminium and unblemished sight lines. And with the latest revision to the 27in model, what's behind that attractive facade is quite likeable too.

Good value
The iMac isn't the cheapest or most powerful all-in-one available, but it's not bad value for money.

The model we reviewed came with Intel's entry-level Core i3 CPU. Even though it runs at 3.2GHz, it's hard to accept that this dual-core chip, coupled with a paltry Radeon HD 5670 graphics processor, is worthy of such a superior machine.

The two cope well surprisingly well, though, easily running Blizzard's World of Warcraft and Starcraft II at maximum detail settings in the native resolution of the 27in screen. If you're editing a lot of HD video you'll want to go for the pricier quad-core option, but for most desktop work you wouldn't notice the difference.

Which brings us onto the value-for-money part: Sony's Vaio L may come with a quad-core CPU for less, but the size and quality of the iMac's IPS display is worth a good percentage of the asking price. Dell's equivalent monitor, for example, currently sells at nearly £900 by itself.

Problematic panels dogged previous 27in models, with several software fixes released to cure green tinges in the LED-backlit screen. Apple says that those problems have been fully cured – and the colours in the panel we tried out are amazingly accurate, leaving other all-in-ones looking wan and washed out.

Magic of multitouch
The one thing that is commonplace in Windows all-in-ones but hasn't reached the iMac yet is a multitouch screen.

Instead, there's the Magic Trackpad: a simple glassy slate, which acts exactly like a four-point MacBook touchpad, but is slightly raked thanks to the battery compartment at the back.

It's not as clever as a touchscreen, but is arguably more practical. It's a fun alternative to a mouse, and works well with pinch, zoom and contextual menu gestures – but it's not exactly a replacement.

In games, for example, interfaces are designed for a mouse and really need one to work, while on the desktop if you try to move a window the full length of the screen, you'll run out of trackpad about halfway through.

Review continues after the break...

 

Headphone hassle
The only real complaint, though, is that the stunning body of the iMac means the headphone sockets are round the back of the screen. That's a hassle if you need to get to them regularly.
 
Fortunately, everything else is superlative. The speakers are the best builtin ones we've heard and it runs silently, even with a disc in the drive. Even if the iMac isn’t the most powerful, it's still the all-in-one to beat.

 

Comments

  1. baxiepeede63

    16 weeks ago

    Caroline. if you think Paul`s posting is super, on saturday I bought a brand new Lancia when I got my cheque for $8892 thiss month and in excess of ten/k last-month. it's actualy the nicest work Ive ever done. I actually started three months/ago and practically straight away got more than $82.. per/hr. I went to this web-site, =====>>bit90.com<<=====

  2. lenoreuprichard35

    17 weeks ago

    If you think Roger`s story is impressive..., 3 weeks ago my doughter got a cheque for $5823 working seventeen hours a week from their apartment and their roomate's aunt`s neighbour has been doing this for four months and made over $5823 part time On there computer. use the guidelines available here... =============bit90.com=============

  3. lenoreuprichard35

    17 weeks ago

    my roomate's aunt makes $68/hr on the laptop. She has been without work for nine months but last month her income was $13477 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site =============bit90.com=============

  4. lisabetty385

    18 weeks ago

    Zachary. if you think Jesse`s comment is impressive... last week I bought themselves a Mini Cooper since I been earnin $5965 this past five weeks and-a little over, ten grand this past-month. this is certainly the easiest job I've ever done. I started this 4 months ago and immediately began to bring in more than $83... p/h. I follow instructions here,, http://www.bit90.com

  5. wak124

    22 weeks ago

    My mothers neighbour is working part time and averaging $9000 a month. I'm a single mum and just got my first paycheck for $6546! I still can't believe it. I tried it out cause I got really desperate and now I couldn't be happier. Here is site where I do, ask22.com

  6. meggilord

    22 weeks ago

    as Josephine answered I'm shocked that anyone able to earn $8263 in one month on the computer. have you read this site link. WWW.ASK22.COM

  7. wmike1503

    44 weeks ago

    Opinionsman - Really, save your money. Shiney, overrated - not reliable. Certainly no better than Microsft PCs. See my earlier comments.

  8. wmike1503

    44 weeks ago

    Update

    My first experience with Apple has been poor. My 18 month old, top of the range iMac 27" has caused me nothing but repeated difficulties. Too many problems to document here. Culminating in total HD failure. Apple could not be less interested.

    So, £1600 lighter in the wallet, I am forced back to Microsoft. I would advise people to think very carefully before wasting their money on Apple.

    Full story here - http://www.thematerconsultancy.com/apple-computers-customer-care-a-lesson/

  9. doibi

    1 year ago

    wow.. this is an awesome review and thanks for that at least I know now. video to Flash converter / hulu to ipad / ipad 3 converter

  10. racking

    1 year ago

    1. The post of racking is cold rolled steel with double hole punch in post. The pitch is 50mm. The hole is to connect beam with post.
    2. Normally us “P” profile beam, what’s is also called step beam. The height of step is the same with the height of shelf.
    3. Steel shelf is cold rolled steel with four sides bending.
    4. Upright frame join together to be frame. Put shelf on the beam. Then the whole medium racking system is finished.
    racking and shelving

  11. optionsman

    1 year ago

    I would definitely want one, are mad about Apple, but I can not close them, are too expensive for me, but maybe in a distant future I will have one. respect and all the best.

  12. NigelD

    2 years ago

    Fantastic piece of kit - get one!

  13. wmike1503

    2 years ago

    Clearly one of the lucky ones :)

  14. wmike1503

    2 years ago

    A long time Windows user - got fed up with the unreliability of Windows machines.

    Convinced by my son (used to work at Stuff) that the Mac was the bees knees.

    Everyone tells me how wonderful the Apple world is. Well, frankly, it's been turning me green.

    My iMac regularly locks up - various apps are guilty of this, particularly Safari - other browsers run badly on this machine also.

    Purchased from Amazon - very reluctant to replace it. Currently in a battle with them.

    My view, so far, with the wonderful World of Apple. No better than Microsoft / PC in my short experience.

    I'm sure, all of the Apple lovers out they will cry foul.

    I can only report what I have in front of me. That is a machine that is nice when it works - but is proving no more reliable than a Windows PC .

    My 3 months of Apple have left me with a sour taste in my mouth.

    A final point - I am amazed that Apple have seen fit to disallow the searching of NAS in Mac OS X - I am not a power user, but I do expect the much vaunted Spotlight to be capable of searching ALL of my drives - this, in my view, is a fundamental requirement of any OS.

  15. mitchscottrosen

    2 years ago

    To call the i3 iMac underpowered is wrong. Especially as the reviewer goes on to say "The [CPU and graphics processor] cope surprisingly well, though, EASILY running Blizzard's World of Warcraft and Starcraft II at maximum detail settings in the native resolution of the 27in screen". This statement suggests that the iMac is MORE than adequately powered. The correct amount of power one might say. The reviewer goes on to say "If you're editing a lot of HD video you'll want to go for the pricier quad-core option, but for most desktop work you WOULDN'T NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE". This further contradicts his own point. For the majority of users, who will no doubt do little more than word processing, browsing and possibly some gaming, the iMac perfectly caters to their needs. After-all...this is the base model (at this resolution). The reviewer appears to state that the iMac is underpowered when compare to the Sony Vaio L, but the Vaio DOES NOT come with a quad-core as standard (the standard version is lower powered than the Mac). The Vaio L may still be cheaper than the base Mac when the quad-core is added, but the reviewer has told us how much better the Mac is in build quality, design and screen resolution AND screen quality! Well there you go, thats the difference in price explained! The reviewer refuted his own claim and made a stronger case in favour of the iMac having the perfect amount of power. This being the case, and the Mac being superior in every other way then it seems an unfair and unfounded criticism to place upon it (especially as the quad-core does not come as standard on the Vaio L). What a wonderful machine the iMac is, beautiful in design, superlative functionality. The epitome of computing excellent. Unless you’re a hardcore gamer, who live without Windows, get the Mac...get a Mac. (Or get a Mac and run Windows on it - but only for gaming!)

Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment

Buzz-o-meter

Buzz-o-meter: imac

  1. Click to see all coverage from Apr 02, 2013
    10
    April 02, 2013
  2. Click to see all coverage from Apr 03, 2013
    3
    April 03, 2013
  3. Click to see all coverage from Apr 04, 2013
    10
    April 04, 2013
  4. Click to see all coverage from Apr 05, 2013
    1
    April 05, 2013
  5. Click to see all coverage from Apr 06, 2013
    2
    April 06, 2013
  6. Click to see all coverage from Apr 07, 2013
    0
    April 07, 2013
  7. Click to see all coverage from Apr 08, 2013
    2
    April 08, 2013
  8. Click to see all coverage from Apr 09, 2013
    14
    April 09, 2013
  9. Click to see all coverage from Apr 10, 2013
    1
    April 10, 2013
  10. Click to see all coverage from Apr 11, 2013
    5
    April 11, 2013
  11. Click to see all coverage from Apr 12, 2013
    7
    April 12, 2013
  12. Click to see all coverage from Apr 13, 2013
    1
    April 13, 2013
  13. Click to see all coverage from Apr 14, 2013
    5
    April 14, 2013
  14. Click to see all coverage from Apr 15, 2013
    4
    April 15, 2013
  15. Click to see all coverage from Apr 16, 2013
    5
    April 16, 2013
  16. Click to see all coverage from Apr 17, 2013
    3
    April 17, 2013
  17. Click to see all coverage from Apr 18, 2013
    5
    April 18, 2013
  18. Click to see all coverage from Apr 19, 2013
    3
    April 19, 2013
  19. Click to see all coverage from Apr 20, 2013
    0
    April 20, 2013
  20. Click to see all coverage from Apr 21, 2013
    0
    April 21, 2013
  21. Click to see all coverage from Apr 22, 2013
    2
    April 22, 2013
  22. Click to see all coverage from Apr 23, 2013
    6
    April 23, 2013
  23. Click to see all coverage from Apr 24, 2013
    3
    April 24, 2013
  24. Click to see all coverage from Apr 25, 2013
    2
    April 25, 2013
  25. Click to see all coverage from Apr 26, 2013
    3
    April 26, 2013
  26. Click to see all coverage from Apr 27, 2013
    0
    April 27, 2013
  27. Click to see all coverage from Apr 28, 2013
    1
    April 28, 2013
  28. Click to see all coverage from Apr 29, 2013
    2
    April 29, 2013
  29. Click to see all coverage from Apr 30, 2013
    0
    April 30, 2013
  30. Click to see all coverage from May 01, 2013
    0
    May 01, 2013
  31. Click to see all coverage from May 02, 2013
    8
    May 02, 2013
  32. Click to see all coverage from May 03, 2013
    6
    May 03, 2013
  33. Click to see all coverage from May 04, 2013
    1
    May 04, 2013
  34. Click to see all coverage from May 05, 2013
    0
    May 05, 2013
  35. Click to see all coverage from May 06, 2013
    2
    May 06, 2013
  36. Click to see all coverage from May 07, 2013
    4
    May 07, 2013
  37. Click to see all coverage from May 08, 2013
    1
    May 08, 2013
  38. Click to see all coverage from May 09, 2013
    5
    May 09, 2013
  39. Click to see all coverage from May 10, 2013
    1
    May 10, 2013
  40. Click to see all coverage from May 11, 2013
    1
    May 11, 2013
  41. Click to see all coverage from May 12, 2013
    1
    May 12, 2013
  42. Click to see all coverage from May 13, 2013
    2
    May 13, 2013
  43. Click to see all coverage from May 14, 2013
    4
    May 14, 2013
  44. Click to see all coverage from May 15, 2013
    2
    May 15, 2013
  45. Click to see all coverage from May 16, 2013
    4
    May 16, 2013
  46. Click to see all coverage from May 17, 2013
    2
    May 17, 2013
  47. Click to see all coverage from May 18, 2013
    0
    May 18, 2013
  48. Click to see all coverage from May 19, 2013
    0
    May 19, 2013

Tech Specs

Bluetooth
Yes
Dimensions
517x650x207mm
DVI
Yes
Graphics card
AMD Radeon HD5670
HDMI
No
Operating system
OSX Snow Leopard
Processor
Intel Core i3 3.2GHz
RAM
4GB
Screen resolution
2560x1440
Screen size
27in
Storage
1TB
Weight
13.8kg
Wi-Fi
Yes