Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Samsung Galaxy S II

04 May 2012

galaxy-S-II-gaming

Samsung Galaxy S3 vs Samsung Galaxy S II – performance

With a 1.4GHz quad-core Exynos processor the S3 is – if early benchmarking tests are to be believed – the fastest smartphone on the planet. The power efficiency of a quad-core, coupled with the more battery friendly screen and huge 2,100mAh battery should make the S3 an all-day mobile, even with heavy use.

The S II's dual-core 1Ghz processor might not sound that impressive – but it can still handle most tasks quick enough to keep up with you. While the 1,560mAh battery may give up before the day is out when used heavily, its lifespan can be stretched with tools like Advanced Task Killer.

Comments

  1. kellymark97

    24 weeks ago

    I just got Samsung Galaxy S III Marble White and i am very happy to have it.It Captures amazing pictures with zero shutter lag using the 8MP camera and Best Photo option, takes 3.3 shots per second and allows me to select the best of eight images taken when Best Photo is turned on.I would say a consumer would only need to spend a few hours with the GS3 to know its a superior product through and through.If any one still using Samsung Galaxy S II then i would suggest to upgrade it with SGS3 .The SGS2 is selling for $232.25 according to this price report http://www.movaluate.com/samsung/galaxy-s-ii-att .

Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment