Apple iPad – what we wanted, what we got

28 Jan 2010

Apple iPad

So the long-rumoured, highly-anticipated Apple Tablet, now known to be the iPad, is finally here – but did it bring with it all the things we were looking for? We go through it blow-by-blow to see whether Steve Jobs delivered on the day.

What we wanted: A 10-inch, nice-looking, travel-friendly tablet

What we got: Ticked boxes all round here. The iPad packs a 9.7-inch screen, measures up at just 0.5 inches thick and weighs a bag-friendly 1.5lbs (0.6kg). Sure, it looks a lot like a blown up iPod Touch, but what's to complain about there?

What we wanted: A price tag under £500

What we got: Well, it's not quite clear yet whether we'll get this or not. Jobs priced up the lowest specced iPad at $499 last night, but failed to let us in on any international pricing details. If we were to simply convert this to pounds by exchange rate, it would mean we'd be looking at around £350, but we've seen enough launches to know that rarely happens. Instead, it's often a case of removing the dollar sign, and replacing it with a pound one. It'd still mean it came in just under £500, but you'd have to decide whether you'd be happy with 16GB of storage and Wifi only – 3G models will cost $120 more on top of the base price, plus a data contract.

What we wanted:
Colour e-ink screen with dedicated ebook mode

What we got: A regular backlit touchscreen, which means reading ebooks could get tiring on the eyes compared to your dedicated e-reader. This also threw concern as to the battery life, but Apple put minds at rest by assuring us of a 10 hour battery life when in use, and up to a month on standby. Jobs also announced iBooks, Apple's ebook store, which not only looks lovely, but could really set the bar high in terms of other ebook stores in the market.

What we wanted:
A tablet great for multimedia use, complete with multitasking

What we got: Browsing the web on the iPad should be a great – it'll be quicker than the iPhone thanks to Apple's proprietary 1GHz processor under the hood, and you'll be able to hop on to Wifi networks or use 3G if you've coughed up the extra for it. The downside is that it doesn't pack the multitasking we'd all thought was a must-have. So although you'll be able to listen to music on iTunes while browsing the web as you can on the iPhone, you won't be able to have a web page open and be working on iWorks, which is a bit of a disappointment.

What we wanted: Flash support, finally

What we got: Although many thought this would be the device that would see Apple have to shake hands with Adobe and allow Flash to work with the iPad, it wasn't. Even when Jobs was showing off the iPad's capabilities he stumbled across a webpage in need of a Flash plugin. Whoops. Here's hoping it comes in an update, or that more Flash websites get behind HTML 5, and sharpish.

What we wanted: A camera

What we got: Despite all the rumours to the contrary, Apple has not added a camera into the iPad, putting an end to hopes of Skype calling and taking stupid photos of yourself in Photo Booth. Still, perhaps we'll see a webcam-shaped iPad accessory on the market soon. Apple knows what it's doing...

What we wanted:
Bespoke iPad apps

What we got:
We got a few, but considering Apple wanted to keep the iPad firmly under their hats, they hadn't shopped it around too much prior to launch. So far we have a few games from the likes of EA, a New York Times app showing what the format could mean for publishing, and of course the specially tweaked apps from Apple including a rather funky-looking Photos app, iWork and iBooks.

We were also told the iPad would run iPhone apps, and be capable of doubling the pixels to upscale them to full iPad screen-size. However, as Jobs announced the iPhone SDK would be expanded to allow developers to start designing apps for the iPad from yesterday, here's hoping we see more iPad-specific apps coming soon.

What we wanted:
Over-the-air ebooks downloads and syncing

What we got: A big tick next to over-the-air downloads – you'll be able to buy ebooks in the same way you can download apps from the App Store and songs from iTunes. Just browse for the title you want, click it, and once downloaded it will appear on your bookshelf, ready for you to read whenever you want to. As for syncing though, you're going to have to hook your iPad up to your computer and do it the old-fashioned way.

What we wanted:
Cool, usable accessories

What we got: So far, so good. Apple announced a protective cover, which folds back to allow the iPad to stand upright for watching movies, and Camera Connection Kit, which will allow you to plug your SD card or camera USB cable into an adaptor and put photos directly on to the iPad without the need of a computer.

Probably the coolest accessory though was the keyboard dock, which sees the iPad attaching to a physical keyboard – good for when you're at home and doing a lot of typing. Strangely though, it only attaches in the portrait position. We'd have thought landscape made far more sense.

What we wanted:
For it not to be called the iSlate

What we got: The "iPad". The jury's still out on the name...

What about you lot – did you get what you wanted? Check out our hands on snaps and first impressions of the iPad, and let us know what you think below.

Comments

  1. paw3001

    2 years ago

    What we wanted was something that was pretty, revolutionary and useful. What we got was a big iTouch!

  2. Snib

    2 years ago

    I downloaded the metro paper today, didn't have to get on the bus to pick it up. 

  3. FazZ

    2 years ago

    Yes, lovely... ...a large iPod Touch that's just as boring! Impressive move on Apple's own CPU, but that is just about it and that just isn't enough.  We all like our gadgets to look pretty, but to 'just' look pretty for that kind of money is a bit too typical Apple for me! [V_V] Next. [-_-]

  4. TXRBIGDAZ

    2 years ago

    I love how Stuff are so Apple biased that they think this is good. Wake up, boys and girls please :)

  5. batsy99

    2 years ago

    No flash! Stupid beyond belief. Wasn't sure if I needed this plus my iphone, now I know. A big fat miss

  6. andrew987williams

    2 years ago

    This is going to be useless for reading books on. Only a 10 hour battery, when all the are doing 7500 page turns. It has nothing that my Samsung NC10 has including a 160gb hard drive. Now ive seen what apple are doing i'm off to buy the amazon Kindle.

  7. paw3001

    2 years ago

    seems everyone else is thinking the same about this waste of time apart from Tom "I love everything Apple" Dunmore Anyone else being reminded of Betamax, Laserdisc or Newton!!! Dead gadget walking!!!!

  8. CHiill

    2 years ago

    i dont thinks its that bad but i agree with everyone that says it isnt much different from an iPhone/iPod touch, there are some extra things but no multitasking (N) i think i will take my chances and see what the second gen brings,

  9. dave_clark_f1ve

    2 years ago

    I was just really disappointed. If they used a bit of common sense then this really could have been the revolutionary device that people hoped. Sadly thanks to the iEgo what people wanted didn't matter because Apple think they know best, so al we have is an overpriced, oversized iPod touch that isn't built to do the jobs it claims to be great at i.e. led screen for an e-reader, no flash for a web browser, no multitasking for a small computer... this could go on a while.

  10. Criss11

    2 years ago

    I am amazed as people's short memories. The "Dead gadget walking" type comment was said by the same type of people about both the Ipod and Iphone. Steve Jobs gave a list of 5 things it would have to do better than a smartphone and laptop. Apart from Music which I am still to be sold on, they have succeded. Add the apps and I can see that the Ipad has legs.

  11. andrew987williams

    2 years ago

    If it could of done E-ink like a proper Ereader then i would of been very intrested. But you could not read for very long on a back light normal computer screen.

  12. paw3001

    2 years ago

    Criss11 - I don't remember anyone saying the iphone or ipod was a dead gadget!  I remember things slightly differently; how the ipod was seamless in making MP3 accessible to the mainstream public for the first time.  The iPhone hailed as the Jesus phone and delivered on that promise(OK apart from a few things which have been sorted via numerous updates.)  Please education me on the 5 things that the ipad beats the iphone on without including screen size and processor, because my laptop already does that!

Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment