Games consoles Microsoft PlayStation 4 Sony Xbox One Microsoft Xbox One vs Sony PS4: in depth Tweet 1 2 3 4 5 Page: Tweet Comments Submitted by Azumith on Sun, 2013-11-24 00:57. @LegionDestroyer, Sony was not the first to use cd-roms for games. NEC's TurboGrafx-CD addon for the TurboGrafx-16 was the first use of cd-roms as a storage medium for games. The Turbografx CD addon was released in 1988 and the Playstation One was released in 1994.And DRM in gaming was used waaaaay before Sony released the PSone.Microsoft would never go back to the strict DRM protection they originally had on the XBone, they would take a massive profit loss, which they wouldn't want to do.Not picking sides here but I'll probably buy an XBone over a PS4 for the Forza series, the only reason I have yet to abandon console gaming all together and beef up a PC for gaming. Submitted by kemah123 on Tue, 2013-11-12 00:10. Here is what i think gamer to gamer. Even though I am a microsoft person i am not going to be a hater to the ps4. The ps4 has improved greatly from the hardware to software. Such as the look of the software and the look of the console. But the 2 major differencess are that the ps4 is a console that will attract to a one on one gamer so just you and the the console. So if you are a hardcore gamer like us Amaricans then you will probably want the ps4. The Xbox one on the other hand is maid for one on one or family. Because it has the kinect 2.0 that senses hart rate and can tell who is holding the controle or who is in that room. To make the ps4 a family console you would have to get the play station eye and the playstation move. That would be about a extra 120$ in us terms but in uk money idk you can convert that or what ever other country is on here. thank you for reading I hope this help you decide. Submitted by donwest on Sun, 2013-10-06 06:32. DRM is not the way to move forward into the future. No matter how much the government protected mercantilist corporations want to trick you into believing that digital downloading and DRM is the wave of the future, it is not.They are gimmicks and PR double talk to make the sheep believe draconian measures to strip you of your consumer rights is the "future". If you break it all the way down, DRM is paid government violence. If you've been caught "pirating" (notice how they try to give poor impoverished people playing a 'digitally downloaded' game shared by an anonymous person on the internet a negative name to make the sheep believe these people are evil pirates) and refuse to pay civil fines and fees, then refuse to go back to court, at some point the government will use violence to get that money from you. Did you initiate the violence? No.Government protectionist laws like copyright laws give the government the facade of legitimacy to the sheep, and if two people have the same idea at the same time, the only one that will get protection from the mafia government is whoever makes it to the government collection building known as the patent office first. Please get your head out of the sand. DRM is NOT the future. It's a step backwards, idiot. Submitted by LegionDestroyer on Wed, 2013-06-19 22:36. @SatinmavanHow are Sony sheep? First to have Bluray player, First to have games on a disc, first to use DRM so widespread, And first to look after the consumer. And even though Microsoft have REMOVED DRM rules, they'll come BACK, They have been slowly introducing them for years now.. Submitted by Satinmavan on Wed, 2013-06-19 20:36. I considered the PS4, but then I remembered Sony have been just like sheep for the past 10 years. Look at where the console world is now, with the exception of Blu-Ray media MS have lead it to where it is today and Sony have followed suit.I think this is what will happen again this generation. Yes MS have made a balls up of trying to get their new policies and ideas across, but if you look into it a bit more closely instead of reading the main stream BS, you'll see it's not actually that bad, but Sony have done a great job of telling the consumer what they want to hear and stealing any thunder away from MS, but I think in a couple of years time, Sony will do what they do best and follow MS like they have done since the first Xbox was launched, they will just do it in dribs and drabs and no one will bat an eye lid. MS are getting the flak now because they're doing it all at once, new generation, new rules, and you can bet your arse Sony will sneak things in in the coming years, they have just been very clever in going against MS and telling people what they want to hear for now. Nobody likes change, and the backlash against MS is proving that Submitted by markster1971 on Wed, 2013-06-19 20:05. Personally, I want a PS4. i feel let down by Microsoft: more expensive console, and no backwards compatibility. At least the PS4 can stream old games.Microsoft just havent bothered with current Xbox fans. So its just ship. PS4 all the way. Submitted by UK1012UK on Wed, 2013-06-19 15:46. Frankly I'm PS4 all the way like most people. I have enough multi media devices already thanks (TV,cable box;PC;tablet,mobile phone and PS3 who all stream as will the PS4). To buy a less powerfull machine just so I can change TV with my waving hand's seems a bit silly. Submitted by nightwatch on Wed, 2013-06-19 15:43. I think to some degree the main difference between xbox one and PS4 is MS is pandering to the coporate and sony to the consumer/gamer. The main problem with MS apporach is that people feel they are not getting anything in return for all the restrictions. Most of the big AAA titles will appear on both paltforms and probably at least PS3 and maybe 360. MS wants the front room, it has done since the 90's. I don't think they care much about gamers - just the money streams - it doesn't matter to them. At least sony seem to want to support gamers and small devs. The more interesting games seem to be on PS4. You'll get all the streaming services on PS4 but they wont shout about it. The switching of game to TV on Xbox one serves little more than a tv remote. MS vision of the home entertainment hub is like that of Sky. Total dominance and control of the consumer. Even more so than the walled garden of apple with the app store. This is a dark future of corporate control and one of assuming all people are guilty of piracy so they have to be controlled and restrained and milked for as much money as possible. Most of the media stuff you can do with smart tvs anyway. Its sumed up with MS comment on if you haven't got an internet connection or reliable one - get yourself a 360 - you're not good enough for a One. They might as well have said get yourself a PS4 - thats an offline device or a Wii U. Technically PS4 looks to have the edge. The kinect will be cool but not in the hands of MS or xbox one - I suspect there will be few titles that use it well. In the end it'll depend on what media and games are avalable and how much it costs to access them. For gaming though I'm going for PS4. Wait a year or so after release and go from there. Submitted by sl8ed on Wed, 2013-06-19 14:46. Nice to actually see some people finally commenting on this website. Still a joke compared to a certain other magazine's website, but ho hum.The truth is that if Sony or MS brought out a console today that only played games (think PS1 or 2) then it would not make them enough money to make it worth their while..... well that's what they think anyway. Personally I would prefer it if it was just a games console, I don't need any of the other stuff I use my PC for already, even the blu ray player is useless to me these days.The point here is "multiple pay streams". i.e. build in as many different ways of fleecing your customers as possible. From the launch documents/videos, how many pay streams can you count? Thats where the iphone/android phones are cleaning up.80 million PS3's sold vs. 1.5 billion iPhone users worldwideOne thing to remember. The PS3 was expected to wipe the floor with the 360, based on specs alone. Never happened did it. For me there are always going to be games that will make it worth having either console. Its down to the games for me and nothing else. These are both going to be great consoles. Enjoy! Submitted by toby liversedge on Wed, 2013-06-19 14:02. If you want an upgradable media centre then buy a media centre pc. They're designed to do everything you mentioned, are software AND hardware upgradable, have the multi-codec capability that a console can only dream of, and can be bought and set up for half the price of an xbox one. You'll have no restrictions on what you can install and because individual components can be upgraded a media centre pc is pretty much future proof.A console is a games machine first and a media centre second. You're just wasting money if you buy an xbox one and then don't play games on it. 1 2 next › last » You have to login or register to comment.